Report | Appendix
Funding, Lack of Clinical Placements are Challenges for International Health Bridging Programs
Internationally educated health professionals (IEHPs) are those who have completed health care training in another country, but who may not have the educational, professional or language requirements to be licensed to practice in Canada. Bridging programs are designed to meet the unique needs of these professionals by providing occupation-specific training on the Canadian and provincial health care systems and standards to meet licensing and employment requirements. A new study by the Higher Education Quality Council of Ontario (HEQCO) examines seven bridging programs and finds that while they are all quite different, they face the common challenges of finding quality clinical placements for students and stable, long-term funding.
Multiple Case Study Evaluations of Postsecondary Bridging Programs for Internationally Educated Health Professionals examines four Ontario bridging programs that serve allied health professionals facing current or projected labour shortages. The study also examined three Alberta-based bridging programs. The case studies involved document reviews, student focus groups, student surveys and follow-up interviews, as well as interviews with program stakeholders. Approximately 50 IEHPs and 30 program stakeholders participated in the research. Additionally interviews were conducted with 15 sector experts from national government agencies, regulatory colleges and professional associations.
While not all programs offered clinical placements for students, those that did faced difficulty finding placements for students. Bridging programs must compete for spaces with regular, full-time health programs, and employers with no IEHP experience are often reluctant to offer placements, believing that these students require more work than a Canadian-trained student. Programs that did not offer clinical placements cited the difficulty of securing space as a reason that they were not available as part of the training.
Many programs start with pilot funding, which provides the support needed to develop the program, but is not a steady, ongoing funding stream. After pilot funding, programs are expected to rely on student tuition fees. However, factors outside of a program’s control, like labour market demand and immigration policies, can lead to fluctuating enrolment numbers. Requiring programs to have a plan for sustainable funding before receiving start-up funding might help solve some of the financial challenges.
The bridging programs examined had significant differences in duration, timing, structure and content, but all had the common goal of assisting IEHPs to become licensed to practice in their respective province and become competent health practitioners. While the stakeholders and experts offered a number of potential indicators for evaluating the success of bridging programs, measuring and tracking these indicators remain challenges.
The potential role of regulatory colleges in improving bridging programs is heavily debated. Regulatory colleges are responsible for setting the standards necessary to practice so they would be a potential partner in the design and delivery of these programs to make sure they are meeting the needs of the sector. They also understand many of the common gaps in knowledge and training IEHPs have when they arrive in Canada. However, regulatory colleges are not mandated to provide education, so there is typically little room in their budgets to act in an advisory role, creating a potentially lost opportunity.
Authors of Multiple Case Study Evaluations of Postsecondary Bridging Programs for Internationally Educated Health Professionals are Peggy Sattler, Julie Peters and Jenna Kelland from Academica Group, Ivy Lynn Bourgeault from University of Ottawa, Victoria Esses from Western University, Elena Neiterman from McMaster University, Elaine Dever from the Canadian Association of Medical Radiation Technologists, consultant Rae Gropper and Christine Nielsen from the Canadian Society for Medical Laboratory Science.
Download the printer-friendly summary
1 Yonge Street, Suite 2402
Toronto, Ontario M5E 1E5
The Higher Education Quality Council of Ontario (HEQCO) is in compliance with the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act, 2005
and its regulations as applicable.
To request HEQCO material in alternate formats, please contact email@example.com
The Higher Education Quality Council of Ontario (HEQCO) welcomes feedback on how we provide accessible customer service. Customer feedback will help us identify barriers and respond to concerns.
Customers who wish to provide feedback on the way HEQCO serves people with disabilities can provide feedback in the following ways:
By email: firstname.lastname@example.orgPhone: 416-212-3893Mail: 1 Yonge Street, Suite 2402, Toronto, Ontario M5E 1E5
All feedback, including complaints, will be handled in the following manner:
Feedback will be reviewed by the Chief Administrative Officer (CAO) and the Manager of Communications to determine the appropriate department to address the concern/request.
Customers can expect to hear back within five business days.
HEQCO will make sure our feedback process is accessible to people with disabilities by providing or arranging for accessible formats and communication supports, on request.